McLean v. Bohannon
McLean v. Bohannon
Opinion
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 03-6997
CLEVELAND MCLEAN, JR., Plaintiff - Appellant,
versus
ROBERT BOHANNON, Bohannon, Bohannon & Hancock, Attorneys at Law; JAMES O. BROCCOLETTI, Zoby & Broccoletti, Attorneys at Law, Defendants - Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Norfolk. Raymond A. Jackson, District Judge. (CA-03-336-2)
Submitted: October 15, 2003 Decided: March 16, 2004
Before WIDENER, LUTTIG, and TRAXLER, Circuit Judges.
Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Cleveland McLean, Jr., Appellant Pro Se.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
See Local Rule 36(c).
PER CURIAM: Cleveland McLean, Jr., appeals the district court’s order denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2000) complaint under 28 U.S.C. § 1915A(b) (2000). We have reviewed the record and find that this appeal is frivolous. Accordingly, we dismiss the appeal on the reasoning of the district court. See McLean v. Bohannon, No. CA-03-336-2 (E.D. Va. May 21, 2003). We deny McLean’s motion for attorney’s fees. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
DISMISSED
- 2 -
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.