Goldman v. Green
Opinion
Gary Elliott Goldman appeals the district court’s order denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2000) complaint under 28 U.S.C. § 1915 (2000). We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. See Goldman v. Green, No. CA-03-473-5-F (E.D.N.C. Aug. 18, 2003). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
Reference
- Full Case Name
- Gary Elliott GOLDMAN, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Calvin GREEN; Sam Cook; David C. Evans; J. Randolph Riley; John H. Baker, Jr.; J.C. Holder, Detective; W.M. Parker, Detective; Wayne Snow, Jr.; James T. Morris; Bettye O. Hutchings; Merle E. Clark; Timothy E. Jones, Defendants-Appellees
- Status
- Unpublished