Reagan v. England
Reagan v. England
Opinion
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 02-2222
MICHELLE L. REAGAN,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
versus
GORDON R. ENGLAND, in his official capacity as Secretary of the Navy,
Defendant - Appellee.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Maryland, at Baltimore. J. Frederick Motz, District Judge. (CA- 02-373-JFM)
Submitted: March 28, 2003 Decided: March 24, 2004
Before MICHAEL, GREGORY, and SHEDD, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
David H. Shapiro, Richard L. Swick, SWICK & SHAPIRO, P.C., Washington, D.C., for Appellant. Thomas M. DiBiagio, United States Attorney, Kristine L. Sendek-Smith, Assistant United States Attorney, Baltimore, Maryland, for Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c). PER CURIAM:
Michelle L. Reagan appeals the district court’s order
granting summary judgment in favor of her former employer in this
employment discrimination action. We have reviewed the parties’
briefs, the district court’s order, and the joint appendix and find
no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated
by the district court. See Reagan v. England, No. CA-02-373-JFM
(D. Md. filed Sept. 4, 2002, and entered Sept. 5, 2002). We
dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions
are adequately presented in the materials before the court and
argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
- 2 -
Reference
- Status
- Unpublished