Brazell v. Maynard

U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
Brazell v. Maynard, 90 F. App'x 59 (4th Cir. 2004)

Brazell v. Maynard

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Ross K. Brazell seeks to appeal the district court’s order adopting a magistrate judge’s recommendation and denying relief on his petition filed under 28 U.S.C. § 2254 (2000). An appeal may not be taken to this court from the final order in a habeas corpus proceeding in which the detention complained of arises out of process issued by a state court unless a circuit justice or judge issues a certificate of ap-pealability. 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(1) (2000). “A certificate of appealability may issue ... only if the applicant has made a substantial showing of a constitutional right.” 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(2). We have independently reviewed the record and conclude that Brazell has not made such a showing. See Miller-El v. Cockrell, 537 U.S. 322, 336, 123 S.Ct. 1029, 154 L.Ed.2d 931 (2003). Accordingly, we deny Brazell’s motion for a certificate of appealability and dismiss the appeal. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED

Reference

Full Case Name
Ross K. BRAZELL, Petitioner-Appellant, v. Gary MAYNARD, Director, SCDC; Charles Condon, Attorney General of the State of South Carolina, Respondents-Appellees
Status
Unpublished