Burks v. Johnson
Burks v. Johnson
Opinion
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 03-7930
PERRY ALLEN BURKS, SR.,
Petitioner - Appellant,
versus
GENE M. JOHNSON, Director, Department of Corrections,
Respondent - Appellee.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Virginia, at Roanoke. James C. Turk, Senior District Judge. (CA-03-727-7)
Submitted: March 25, 2004 Decided: April 1, 2004
Before TRAXLER, KING, and DUNCAN, Circuit Judges.
Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Perry Allen Burks, Sr., Appellant Pro Se.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c). PER CURIAM:
Perry Allen Burks, Sr., seeks to appeal the district
court’s order dismissing as untimely his habeas corpus petition
filed under
28 U.S.C. § 2254(2000). An appeal may not be taken
from the final order in a habeas corpus proceeding unless a circuit
justice or judge issues a certificate of appealability.
28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(1) (2000). A certificate of appealability will not issue
absent “a substantial showing of the denial of a constitutional
right.”
28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(2) (2000). A prisoner satisfies this
standard by demonstrating that reasonable jurists would find that
his constitutional claims are debatable and that any dispositive
procedural rulings by the district court are also debatable or
wrong. See Miller-El v. Cockrell,
537 U.S. 322, 336(2003); Slack
v. McDaniel,
529 U.S. 473, 484(2000); Rose v. Lee,
252 F.3d 676, 683(4th Cir. 2001). We have independently reviewed the record and
conclude that Burks has not made the requisite showing.
Accordingly, we deny a certificate of appealability and dismiss the
appeal. We deny Burks’ motion for production of documents. We
dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions
are adequately presented in the materials before the court and
argument would not aid the decisional process.
DISMISSED
- 2 -
Reference
- Status
- Unpublished