United States v. Crockett

U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit March 31, 2004

Opinion

No. 03-7882

Plaintiff - Appellee,

versus

TIMOTHY DALE CROCKETT, a/k/a Timothy Howard Crockett, a/k/a Timothy Dale Neill, a/k/a Timothy Dwayne Pope, Jr.,

Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina, at Spartanburg. G. Ross Anderson, Jr., District Judge. (CR-98-798)

Submitted: March 25, 2004 Decided: March 31, 2004

Before TRAXLER, KING, and DUNCAN, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Timothy Dale Crockett, Appellant Pro Se. Harold Watson Gowdy, III, OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Greenville, South Carolina, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c). PER CURIAM:

Timothy Dale Crockett appeals the district court’s order

denying his request to modify the conditions of his supervised

release by delaying his restitution payments until his supervised

release period commences. We have reviewed the record and find no

reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by

the district court. See United States v. Crockett, No. CR-98-798

(D.S.C. Nov. 14, 2003). We dispense with oral argument because the

facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the

materials before the court and argument would not aid the

decisional process.

- 2 -