William M. Bryson, Jr., appeals from the district court’s order denying his motion for return of property pursuant to Fed. R.Crim.P. 41. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm the district court’s order. See Floyd v. United States, 860 F.2d 999, 1003 (10th Cir. 1988). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED