Charles William Levy appeals the district court’s orders denying relief on his action challenging Virginia’s ballot restriction limiting a candidate to two offices, *882 Va.Code Ann. §§ 24.2-504, 24.2-525 (Michie 2000). We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. See Levy v. Jensen, No. CA-03-763-A (E.D. Va. Sept. 27, 2003; Oct. 27, 2003). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED