Fulton v. Rosebrough

U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit

Fulton v. Rosebrough

Opinion

UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 03-2052

DARRYL FULTON,

Plaintiff - Appellant,

versus

RODNEY ROSEBROUGH; UNITED PARCEL SERVICE, INCORPORATED,

Defendants - Appellees,

and

DAVID K. CARMAN; LAURIE KERSAT,

Defendants,

ALFREDA WILLIAMSON,

Respondent.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of North Carolina, at Raleigh. W. Earl Britt, Senior District Judge. (CA-01-373-5-BR(2))

Submitted: February 25, 2004 Decided: March 30, 2004

Before WILKINSON, LUTTIG, and SHEDD, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Darryl Fulton, Appellant Pro Se. Meredith S. Jeffries, Brian D. Edwards, ALSTON & BIRD, L.L.P., Charlotte, North Carolina, for Appellees.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).

- 2 - PER CURIAM:

Darryl Fulton appeals the district court’s order

dismissing his employment discrimination action. Fulton contends

that the district court ignored evidence in awarding summary

judgment to the Defendants. We have reviewed the record and find

no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated

by the district court. See Fulton v. Rosebrough, No. CA-01-373-5-

BR(2) (E.D.N.C. Aug. 7, 2003). We dispense with oral argument

because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in

the materials before the court and argument would not aid the

decisional process.

AFFIRMED

- 3 -

Reference

Status
Unpublished