Stigall v. Thompson
Stigall v. Thompson
Opinion
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 03-7714
COLEMAN A. STIGALL, III, Plaintiff - Appellant, versus
LEVESTER THOMPSON, Physician, Nottoway Correctional Center; NASEER MOBASHAR, Doctor, Buckingham Correctional Center, Defendants - Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Virginia, at Roanoke. Samuel G. Wilson, Chief District Judge. (CA-02-1281-7)
Submitted: March 31, 2004 Decided: April 12, 2004
Before WILLIAMS, MOTZ, and GREGORY, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Coleman A. Stigall, III, Appellant Pro Se. Edward Joseph McNelis, III, John David McChesney, RAWLS & MCNELIS, P.C., Richmond, Virginia, for Appellees.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
See Local Rule 36(c).
PER CURIAM: Coleman A. Stigall, III, appeals the district court’s order denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2000) complaint. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error.
Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. See Stigall v. Thompson, No. CA-02-1281-7 (W.D. Va. Sept. 30, 2003). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
- 2 -
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.