U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit, 2004

Fomuso v. Ashcroft

Fomuso v. Ashcroft
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · Decided April 29, 2004

Fomuso v. Ashcroft

Opinion

UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 03-2123

ELVIRA BOH FOMUSO, Petitioner, versus

JOHN ASHCROFT, Attorney General, Respondent.

On Petition for Review of an Order of the Board of Immigration Appeals. (A76-911-120)

Submitted: April 19, 2004 Decided: April 29, 2004

Before WIDENER, MOTZ, and KING, Circuit Judges.

Petition denied by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Byron R. Mobley, WALKER, BROWN AND BROWN, P.A., Hernando, Mississippi, for Petitioner. Peter D. Keisler, Assistant Attorney General, Linda S. Wernery, Senior Litigation Counsel, William C.

Minick, OFFICE OF IMMIGRATION LITIGATION, Washington, D.C., for Respondent.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

See Local Rule 36(c).

PER CURIAM: Elvira Boh Fomuso, a native and citizen of Cameroon, petitions for review of an order of the Board of Immigration Appeals (“Board”) affirming the immigration judge’s denial of her applications for asylum and withholding of removal. We have reviewed the administrative record and the Board’s decision and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we deny the petition for review on the reasoning of the Board. See In re: Fomuso, No. A76-911-120 (B.I.A. Aug. 21, 2003). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

PETITION DENIED

- 2 -

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.