Jafari v. GMC
Jafari v. GMC
Opinion
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 03-2133
EMMETT JOHNSON JAFARI, Plaintiff - Appellant, versus
GENERAL MOTORS CORPORATION; SATURN CORPORATION,
Defendants - Appellees, and
SATURN OF RICHMOND, INCORPORATED, Defendant.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Richmond. Robert E. Payne, District Judge. (CA-02-918)
Submitted: March 29, 2004 Decided: May 7, 2004
Before WIDENER, MICHAEL, and TRAXLER, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Emmett Johnson Jafari, Appellant Pro Se. David Drake Hudgins, Sean Charles Edward McDonough, HUDGINS LAW FIRM, Alexandria, Virginia, for Appellees.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
See Local Rule 36(c).
- 2 - PER CURIAM: Emmett Johnson Jafari appeals the district court’s order accepting a magistrate judge’s recommendation to grant Defendants’ motion for summary judgment in this civil action, and a subsequent order denying Jafari’s motion to vacate judgment. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. See Jafari v. Gen. Motors Corp., No. CA-02-918 (E.D. Va. Sept. 12, 2003; Aug. 26, 2003). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
- 3 -
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.