Mosby v. Sweat
Mosby v. Sweat
Opinion
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 04-6247
CHRISTOPHER MOSBY, Plaintiff - Appellant, versus
GEORGE L. SWEAT, Chief of Police; POLICE DETECTIVE WILLIAMS; R. L. BARREN, Police Detective, Defendants - Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Middle District of North Carolina, at Durham. William L. Osteen, District Judge. (CA-03-1009-1)
Submitted: April 29, 2004 Decided: May 5, 2004
Before LUTTIG, WILLIAMS, and SHEDD, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed as modified by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Christopher Mosby, Appellant Pro Se.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
See Local Rule 36(c).
PER CURIAM: Christopher Mosby appeals the district court’s order adopting the magistrate judge’s recommendation and denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2000) complaint under 28 U.S.C. § 1915A(b) (2000). We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error.
Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court as modified to reflect that the district court’s dismissal was without prejudice. See Mosby v. Sweat, No. CA-03-1009-1 (M.D.N.C. Dec. 24, 2003). Mosby’s motion to compel discovery, for expenses, and for sanctions is denied. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED AS MODIFIED
- 2 -
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.