Garri Shtein appeals the magistrate judge’s letter order dismissing his discrimination and conspiracy to invade privacy action with prejudice. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. * Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the magistrate judge. See Shtein v. Bank of America, No. CA-03-1159-CBD (D.Md. Nov. 14, 2003). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED