Charles K. Hamilton appeals the district court’s order granting Defendant’s motion for summary judgment on his complaint alleging excessive exposure to carbon monoxide. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. See Hamilton v. Pilgrim’s Pride Corp., No. CA-03-9-2 (N.D.W.Va. Mar. 29, 2004). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED