Jarmuth v. Charles Schwab
Jarmuth v. Charles Schwab
Opinion
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 04-1394
RONALD E. JARMUTH, Plaintiff - Appellant, versus
CHARLES SCHWAB AND COMPANY, Defendant - Appellee.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of West Virginia, at Clarksburg. Irene M. Keeley, Chief District Judge. (CA-03-80-1)
Submitted: June 2, 2004 Decided: June 16, 2004
Before NIEMEYER, WILLIAMS, and TRAXLER, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Ronald E. Jarmuth, Appellant Pro Se. Thomas Ryan Goodwin, GOODWIN & GOODWIN, L.L.P., Charleston, West Virginia, for Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
See Local Rule 36(c).
PER CURIAM: Ronald E. Jarmuth appeals the district court’s order granting summary judgment for Charles Schwab on his action filed under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, 15 U.S.C. § 78j (2000).
We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error.
Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. See Jarmuth v. Charles Schwab & Co., No. CA-03-80-1 (N.D.W.
Va. Mar. 3, 2004). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
- 2 -
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.