Virgil W. Womack appeals the district court’s order of December 5, 2003, denying his “Motion to Vacate Restitution Order Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 3664(k).” We have reviewed the record and the court’s order and find no reversible error in the denial of Womack’s motion. Accordingly, we affirm. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED