Pearson v. Saar
Pearson v. Saar
100 F. App'x 952
Pearson v. Saar
Opinion
Demetric Gray Pearson appeals the district court’s order granting Defendants’ motion for summary judgment and denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2000) complaint. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. See Pearson v. Saar, No. CA-03-3642-RDB (D. Md. filed Mar. 18, 2004 & entered Mar. 19, 2004). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.