Rodney Victor Harris appeals the district court’s order dismissing his complaint alleging claims under 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2000). We have reviewed the record and find that this appeal is frivolous. Accordingly, we deny Harris’s motion for a continuance and dismiss the appeal on the reasoning of the district court. See Harris v. Rader, No. CA-03-572-7 (W.D.Va. Nov. 13, 2003). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED