U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit, 2004

United States v. Mikhail

United States v. Mikhail
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · Decided June 29, 2004

United States v. Mikhail

Opinion

UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 04-4157

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff - Appellee, versus

AMEER G. MIKHAIL, Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Maryland, at Baltimore. Catherine C. Blake, District Judge. (CR- 03-407)

Submitted: April 28, 2004 Decided: June 29, 2004

Before GREGORY and DUNCAN, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Ameer G. Mikhail, Appellant Pro Se. Michael Clayton Hanlon, OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Baltimore, Maryland, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

See Local Rule 36(c).

PER CURIAM: Ameer G. Mikhail appeals the district court’s order affirming the magistrate judge’s finding of guilt for a traffic violation. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. See United States v. Mikhail, No. CR-03-407 (D.

Md. Feb. 10, 2004). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

- 2 -

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.