Isatah Mary Conteh, a native and citizen of Sierra Leone, petitions for review of an order of the Board of Immigration Appeals (“Board”) affirming the immigration judge’s decision to deny her motion to reopen immigration proceedings. We have reviewed the record and conclude that the Board did not abuse its discretion in upholding the denial of Conteh’s motion to reopen. See 8 C.F.R. § 1003.2(a) (2003); INS v. Doherty, 502 U.S. 314, 323-24, 112 S.Ct. 719, 116 L.Ed.2d 823 (1992). The record reveals that the notice was mailed to Conteh’s last known address and that she failed to keep the immigration court apprised of changes in her address. See 8 U.S.C. § 1252b(a)(l)(F) (1994) (“[T]he alien must provide the Attorney General immediately with a written record of any change of the alien’s address”); 8 U.S.C. § 1252b(a)(2) (1994) 1 (“[Wjritten notice shall not be required under this paragraph if the alien has failed to provide the address required under subsection (a)(1)(F)”); Dominguez v. United States Atty. Gen., 284 F.3d 1258, 1260 (11th Cir. 2002). We find no abuse of discretion under these circumstances. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

PETITION DENIED