Timmie R. Locklear appeals the district court’s order dismissing his action filed under 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2000). We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. See Locklear v. Bennett, No. CA-04-31-1-1MU (W.D.N.C. filed Apr. 2, 2004 & entered Apr. 6, 2004). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED