Hooker v. Jarvis
Hooker v. Jarvis
102 F. App'x 804
Hooker v. Jarvis
Opinion
Barry Lynn Hooker appeals the district court’s orders denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2000) complaint. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. See Hooker v. Jarvis, No. CA-03-703-7 (WD.Va. filed Feb. 19, 2004; entered Feb. 20, 2004 & filed March 30, 2004; entered March 31, 2004). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.