U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit, 2004

United States v. Hoberek

United States v. Hoberek
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · Decided August 17, 2004

United States v. Hoberek

Opinion

UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 03-7872

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff - Appellee, versus

STANLEY HOBEREK, Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of West Virginia, at Wheeling. Frederick P. Stamp, Jr., District Judge. (CR-99-13)

Submitted: August 12, 2004 Decided: August 17, 2004

Before NIEMEYER, WILLIAMS, and TRAXLER, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Stanley Hoberek, Appellant Pro Se. Robert H. McWilliams, Jr., Assistant United States Attorney, Wheeling, West Virginia, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

See Local Rule 36(c).

PER CURIAM: Stanley Hoberek appeals the district court’s order denying his Fed. R. Crim. P. 35 motion for correction of illegal sentence. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. See United States v. Hoberek, No. CR-99-13 (N.D.W.

Va. Nov. 7, 2003). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

- 2 -

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.