Ramon Charles Chapman appeals the magistrate judge’s order denying his mo *351 tion for reconsideration of his Social Security action. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the magistrate judge. See Chapman v. Soc. Sec. Admin., No. CA-2-04 (E.D.Va. filed Feb. 11, 2004; entered Feb. 12, 2004). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED