Burgest v. Wiley
Opinion
Lamar E. Burgest, III, a federal prisoner, appeals the district court’s order denying relief on his petition filed under 28 U.S.C. § 2241 (2000). We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. See Burgest v. Wiley, No. CA-04-115-3 (E.D.Va. Mar. 15, 2004). We deny leave to proceed on appeal in forma pauperis and dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal conten *363 tions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
Reference
- Full Case Name
- Lamar E. BURGEST, III, Petitioner—Appellant, v. Ron WILEY, Warden, Respondent—Appellee
- Cited By
- 1 case
- Status
- Unpublished