U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit, 2004

Saunders v. City of Petersburg PD

Saunders v. City of Petersburg PD
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · Decided September 1, 2004

Saunders v. City of Petersburg PD

Opinion

UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 04-1713

EARNESTINE SAUNDERS, Plaintiff - Appellant, versus

THE CITY OF PETERSBURG POLICE DEPARTMENT; A.

A. MIMMS, Officer; W. B. HINKLE, Officer; J.

H. CHABINAK, MPO, and others who’s names have been sealed and unknown to myself and others; CITY OF PETERSBURG; J. K. KUYENDALL, Officer of Prince George County Police Department; PETE LUCY, of Tri-City Wrecker Service, Defendants - Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Richmond. Dennis W. Dohnal, Magistrate Judge. (CA-03-697-3)

Submitted: August 26, 2004 Decided: September 1, 2004

Before WIDENER and SHEDD, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Earnestine Saunders, Appellant Pro Se. William C. Tucker, HARMAN, CLAYTOR, CORRIGAN & WELLMAN, Glen Allen, Virginia; Robert A.

Dybing, THOMPSON & MCMULLAN, Richmond, Virginia, for Appellees.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

See Local Rule 36(c).

- 2 - PER CURIAM: Earnestine Saunders appeals the magistrate judge’s order denying relief on her 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2000) complaint. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. See Saunders v. City of Petersburg Police Dep’t, No. CA-03-697-3 (E.D. Va. May 11, 2004). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

- 3 -

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.