U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit, 2004

Lawyers Title Insurance v. Haire

Lawyers Title Insurance v. Haire
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · Decided August 30, 2004

Lawyers Title Insurance v. Haire

Opinion

UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 03-1839

LAWYERS TITLE INSURANCE CORPORATION, Plaintiff - Appellee, versus

ROBERT L. HAIRE; MARY JO HAIRE, Defendants - Appellants.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Maryland, at Baltimore. Catherine C. Blake, District Judge. (CA- 02-4111-CCB)

Submitted: February 27, 2004 Decided: August 30, 2004

Before WIDENER, TRAXLER, and SHEDD, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Onkar N. Sharma, SHARMA & BHANDARI, Silver Spring, Maryland, for Appellants. Gerald W. Heller, Jessica N. Drexler, LINOWES AND BLOCHER, L.L.P., Bethesda, Maryland, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

See Local Rule 36(c).

PER CURIAM: Robert L. Haire and Mary Jo Haire appeal from the district court’s order granting summary judgment in favor of Lawyers Title Insurance Corporation on Lawyers Title’s claims for breach of contract, negligent misrepresentation, indemnity, and breach of guaranty arising out of the Haires’ sale of real estate.

We have reviewed the parties’ briefs, the joint appendix, and the district court’s opinion and orders and find no reversible error.

Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. See Lawyers Title Ins. Corp. v. Haire, No. CA-02-4111-CCB (D. Md. June 18, 2003). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

- 2 -

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.