Lawyers Title Insurance v. Haire
Lawyers Title Insurance v. Haire
Opinion
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 03-1839
LAWYERS TITLE INSURANCE CORPORATION, Plaintiff - Appellee, versus
ROBERT L. HAIRE; MARY JO HAIRE, Defendants - Appellants.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Maryland, at Baltimore. Catherine C. Blake, District Judge. (CA- 02-4111-CCB)
Submitted: February 27, 2004 Decided: August 30, 2004
Before WIDENER, TRAXLER, and SHEDD, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Onkar N. Sharma, SHARMA & BHANDARI, Silver Spring, Maryland, for Appellants. Gerald W. Heller, Jessica N. Drexler, LINOWES AND BLOCHER, L.L.P., Bethesda, Maryland, for Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
See Local Rule 36(c).
PER CURIAM: Robert L. Haire and Mary Jo Haire appeal from the district court’s order granting summary judgment in favor of Lawyers Title Insurance Corporation on Lawyers Title’s claims for breach of contract, negligent misrepresentation, indemnity, and breach of guaranty arising out of the Haires’ sale of real estate.
We have reviewed the parties’ briefs, the joint appendix, and the district court’s opinion and orders and find no reversible error.
Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. See Lawyers Title Ins. Corp. v. Haire, No. CA-02-4111-CCB (D. Md. June 18, 2003). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
- 2 -
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.