Awoyemi v. Ashcroft
Awoyemi v. Ashcroft
Opinion
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 04-1188
KOLAWOLE I. AWOYEMI,
Petitioner,
versus
JOHN ASHCROFT, Attorney General,
Respondent.
On Petition for Review of an Order of the Board of Immigration Appeals. (A75-836-158)
Submitted: August 18, 2004 Decided: September 15, 2004
Before NIEMEYER, WILLIAMS, and GREGORY, Circuit Judges.
Petition denied by unpublished per curiam opinion.
David Goren, LAW OFFICE OF DAVID GOREN, Silver Spring, Maryland, for Petitioner. Peter D. Keisler, Assistant Attorney General, David V. Bernal, Assistant Director, Ernesto H. Molina, Senior Litigation Counsel, Washington, D.C., for Respondent.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c). PER CURIAM:
Kolawole I. Awoyemi, a native and citizen of Nigeria,
petitions for review of an order of the Board of Immigration
Appeals (“Board”) denying his motion to reopen and to reconsider
its previous order affirming the immigration judge’s denial of his
motion to reopen immigration proceedings. We have reviewed the
record and the Board’s order and find that the Board did not abuse
its discretion in denying Awoyemi’s motion. See
8 C.F.R. § 1003.2(a) (2004). Accordingly, we deny the petition for review
on the reasoning of the Board. See In re: Awoyemi, No. A75-836-158
(B.I.A. Jan. 15, 2004). We dispense with oral argument because the
facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the
materials before the court and argument would not aid the
decisional process.
PETITION DENIED
- 2 -
Reference
- Status
- Unpublished