U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit, 2004

Pridgen v. Georgia-Pacific Corp.

Pridgen v. Georgia-Pacific Corp.
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · Decided September 14, 2004 · Wilkinson, Michael, Gregory
109 F. App'x 525

Pridgen v. Georgia-Pacific Corp.

Opinion

PER CURIAM:

Samuel Davis Pridgen appeals the magistrate judge’s order awarding attorney’s fees and costs to Appellees. * We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the magistrate judge in his order. See Pridgen v. Georgia-Pacific Corp., No. CA-03-102-7-F(1) (E.D.N.C. Jan. 16, 2004). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

*

Pridgen did not timely appeal the district court’s final order granting summary judgment in favor of the Appellees,

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.