Pridgen v. Georgia-Pacific Corp.

U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
Pridgen v. Georgia-Pacific Corp., 109 F. App'x 525 (4th Cir. 2004)

Pridgen v. Georgia-Pacific Corp.

Opinion

PER CURIAM:

Samuel Davis Pridgen appeals the magistrate judge’s order awarding attorney’s fees and costs to Appellees. * We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the magistrate judge in his order. See Pridgen v. Georgia-Pacific Corp., No. CA-03-102-7-F(1) (E.D.N.C. Jan. 16, 2004). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

*

Pridgen did not timely appeal the district court’s final order granting summary judgment in favor of the Appellees,

Reference

Full Case Name
Samuel Davis PRIDGEN, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. GEORGIA-PACIFIC CORPORATION; Keith Fuller; Wrenn Bullock; Mike Register, Defendants-Appellees
Status
Unpublished