Denise and John Cordero, individually and on behalf of their minor children, appeal the district court’s order abstaining from exercising jurisdiction over their 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2000) complaint. We have reviewed the record and find that the district court did not abuse its discretion in abstaining under Younger v. Harris, 401 U.S. 37, 91 S.Ct. 746, 27 L.Ed.2d 669 (1971). Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. See Cordero v. Mecklenburg County Youth & Family Servs., No. CA-02-294-3 (W.D.N.C. Feb. 9, 2004). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED