United States v. Lane
United States v. Lane
109 F. App'x 616
United States v. Lane
Opinion
Alloric Tewan Lane appeals the district court’s order denying his motion to compel the government to file a Fed.R.Crim.P. 35(b) motion on his behalf. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. See United States v. Lane, No. CR-97-147 (D.S.C. June 22, 2004). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.