Warren Clifton appeals the district court’s order denying relief on Clifton’s motion filed under 28 U.S.C. § 2255 (2000). We previously granted a certificate of appealability on Clifton’s claim that counsel was ineffective under United States v. Peak, 992 F.2d 39 (4th Cir. 1993). Upon review of the parties’ briefs and the record, we find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm the order of the district court. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED