Ingle v. Barnhart, Comm
Opinion
Janice C. Ingle appeals the magistrate judge’s decision * upholding the decision of the Commissioner to deny Ingle’s application for disability insurance benefits. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. See Ingle v. Barnhart, No. CA-03-7 (W.D.N.C. filed Aug. 19, 2003; entered Aug. 20, 2003). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
*
The parties consented to the jurisdiction of the magistrate judge.
Reference
- Full Case Name
- Janice C. INGLE, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Jo Anne B. BARNHART, Commissioner of Social Security, Defendant-Appellee
- Status
- Unpublished