Crisp v. NC Department Corr

U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit

Crisp v. NC Department Corr

Opinion

UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 04-7131

TAURICE M. CRISP,

Plaintiff - Appellant,

versus

NORTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS; DOCTOR BOWMAN; MR. MUNNS; DOCTOR SHODELL,

Defendants - Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of North Carolina, at Raleigh. Louise W. Flanagan, District Judge. (CA-04-343-5-FL)

Submitted: September 16, 2004 Decided: September 24, 2004

Before LUTTIG, KING, and DUNCAN, Circuit Judges.

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Taurice M. Crisp, Appellant Pro Se.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c). PER CURIAM:

Taurice M. Crisp seeks to appeal the district court’s

order directing prison officials to deduct a percentage of his

monthly income from his prison account to pay the filing fee. This

court may exercise jurisdiction only over final orders,

28 U.S.C. § 1291

(2000), and certain interlocutory and collateral orders,

28 U.S.C. § 1292

(2000); Fed. R. Civ. P. 54(b); Cohen v. Beneficial

Indus. Loan Corp.,

337 U.S. 541

(1949). The order Crisp seeks to

appeal is neither a final order nor an appealable interlocutory or

collateral order. Accordingly, we dismiss the appeal for lack of

jurisdiction. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and

legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before

the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED

- 2 -

Reference

Status
Unpublished