Ryidu-X v. Department of Public Safety & Correctional Services
Opinion
Malcolm Maxwell Ryidu-X appeals the district court’s order denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2000) complaint. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. See Ryidu-X v. Department of Public Safety and Correctional Servs., No. CA-03-2898-WDQ (D.Md. Apr. 26, 2004). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
Reference
- Full Case Name
- Malcolm Maxwell RYIDU-X, A/K/A Richard Edward Janey, Plaintiff—Appellant, v. DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC SAFETY AND CORRECTIONAL SERVICES; Inmate Grievance Office; Paula R. Kramer, Associate Warden; Maryland Division of Correction; Patricia Allen, Commissioner; Maryland Correctional Adjustment Center; Sewall Smith, Warden; Corporal Marks, Defendants—Appellees
- Status
- Unpublished