King v. Alghanem
King v. Alghanem
Opinion
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).
Mohammad Alghanem and Manal Abok-widir, husband and wife, appeal from the district court’s order, affirming the bankruptcy court’s order setting aside the transfer of Alghanem’s property, from Al-ghanem to himself and his wife, as a fraudulent conveyance under 11 U.S.C. § 548(a)(1) (2000). We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. See King v. Algha nem, No. CA-03-1112-A (E.D.Va. Jan. 12, 2004). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.