In re: Vance v.

U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
In re: Vance v., 110 F. App'x 359 (4th Cir. 2004)

In re: Vance v.

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Ricky Lee Vance petitions for writ of mandamus, alleging the district court has unduly delayed acting on his motion for reduction in sentence filed pursuant to Fed.R.Crim.P. 35. He seeks an order from this court directing the district court to act. Our review of the docket sheet reveals that the district court dismissed Vance’s motion in an order filed on August 27, 2004. Accordingly, because the district court has recently decided Vance’s case, we deny the mandamus petition as moot. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

PETITION DENIED

Reference

Full Case Name
In Re: Ricky Lee VANCE, Petitioner
Status
Unpublished