Hoskin v. Fahey

U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit October 15, 2004

Opinion

No. 04-7144

Plaintiff - Appellant,

versus

HELEN F. FAHEY; DAVID N. HARKER; CAROL ANN SIEVERS; HERBERT COULTON; MICHAEL M. HAWES,

Defendants - Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Alexandria. Claude M. Hilton, Chief District Judge. (CA-04-192)

Submitted: October 7, 2004 Decided: October 15, 2004

Before WIDENER, NIEMEYER, and WILLIAMS, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Danny Hoskin, Appellant Pro Se.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c). PER CURIAM:

Danny Hoskin appeals the district court’s orders

dismissing his

42 U.S.C. § 1983

(2000) complaint and denying his

motion to alter or amend judgment under Fed. R. Civ. P. 59(e). We

have reviewed the record and find no reversible error.

Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district

court. See Hoskin v. Fahey, No. CA-04-192 (E.D. Va. filed Apr. 7,

2004 & entered Apr. 12, 2004; filed June 22, 2004 & entered

June 24, 2004). We dispense with oral argument because the facts

and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials

before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

- 2 -