Michael Edward Jones appeals the district court’s order denying his 28 U.S.C. § 2241 (2000) motion. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. See Jones v. United States, No. CA-04-140-02-MU (W.D.N.C. Apr. 16, 2004). We also grant Jones’ motion for in forma pauperis status. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are ade *170 quately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED