Gohari v. Ross
Gohari v. Ross
Opinion
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 04-1887
MAROKH KAMKAR-PARSI,
Plaintiff,
A. MASOUD GOHARI,
Defendant - Appellant,
versus
ALAN ROSS,
Defendant - Appellee,
and
EARLY RETIREMENT ACCOUNT OF UPTOWN WOMEN’S CLINIC,
Defendant.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Maryland, at Greenbelt. Alexander Williams, Jr., District Judge. (CA-02-296-AW)
Submitted: October 7, 2004 Decided: October 13, 2004
Before WIDENER, NIEMEYER, and WILLIAMS, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. John G. Gill, Jr., GILL & SIPPEL, Rockville, Maryland, for Appellant. Alan Ross, Appellee Pro Se.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).
- 2 - PER CURIAM:
A. Masoud Gohari appeals the district court’s order
denying his motion for attorney’s fees. We have reviewed the
record and find the court did not abuse its discretion in not
granting the motion. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated
by the district court. See Parsi v. Gohari, No. CA-02-296-AW (D.
Md. June 30, 2004). We dispense with oral argument because the
facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the
materials before the court and argument would not aid the
decisional process.
AFFIRMED
- 3 -
Reference
- Status
- Unpublished