Gohari v. Ross

U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit

Gohari v. Ross

Opinion

UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 04-1887

MAROKH KAMKAR-PARSI,

Plaintiff,

A. MASOUD GOHARI,

Defendant - Appellant,

versus

ALAN ROSS,

Defendant - Appellee,

and

EARLY RETIREMENT ACCOUNT OF UPTOWN WOMEN’S CLINIC,

Defendant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Maryland, at Greenbelt. Alexander Williams, Jr., District Judge. (CA-02-296-AW)

Submitted: October 7, 2004 Decided: October 13, 2004

Before WIDENER, NIEMEYER, and WILLIAMS, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. John G. Gill, Jr., GILL & SIPPEL, Rockville, Maryland, for Appellant. Alan Ross, Appellee Pro Se.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).

- 2 - PER CURIAM:

A. Masoud Gohari appeals the district court’s order

denying his motion for attorney’s fees. We have reviewed the

record and find the court did not abuse its discretion in not

granting the motion. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated

by the district court. See Parsi v. Gohari, No. CA-02-296-AW (D.

Md. June 30, 2004). We dispense with oral argument because the

facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the

materials before the court and argument would not aid the

decisional process.

AFFIRMED

- 3 -

Reference

Status
Unpublished