UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 04-1424

CAROLINE CHEBET SOI,

Petitioner,

versus

JOHN ASHCROFT, Attorney General for the United States,

Respondent.

On Petition for Review of an Order of the Board of Immigration Appeals. (A76-596-913)

Submitted: September 20, 2004 Decided: October 12, 2004

Before WILLIAMS and MOTZ, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge.

Petition denied by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Sean D. Hummel, Washington, D.C., for Petitioner. Peter D. Keisler, Assistant Attorney General, Margaret J. Perry, Senior Litigation Counsel, Stephen J. Flynn, Office of Immigration Litigation, UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE, Washington, D.C., for Respondent.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c). PER CURIAM:

Caroline Chebet Soi, a native and citizen of Kenya,

petitions for review of the Board of Immigration Appeals’ (“Board”)

order affirming the immigration judge’s (“IJ”) denial of her motion

to reopen.

We review the denial of a motion to reopen for abuse of

discretion.

(a) (2004); INS v. Doherty,

(1992); Stewart v. INS,

(4th Cir.

1999). The denial of a motion to reopen must be reviewed with

extreme deference, since immigration statutes do not contemplate

reopening and the applicable regulations disfavor motions to

reopen. M.A. v. INS,

, 308 (4th Cir. 1990) (en banc).

We have reviewed the administrative record, the Board’s order, and

the IJ’s decision and find no abuse of discretion.

Accordingly, we deny the petition for review. We

dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions

are adequately presented in the materials before the court and

argument would not aid the decisional process.

PETITION DENIED

- 2 -