Ryidu-X v. MD Correctional
Ryidu-X v. MD Correctional
Opinion
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 04-6989
MALCOLM MAXWELL RYIDU-X, a/k/a Richard Edward Janey,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
versus
MARYLAND CORRECTIONAL ADJUSTMENT CENTER; THOMAS R. CORCORAN, Former Warden; SEWALL SMITH, Warden; AHAMEFULE GRANT EMEZUE, Corporal,
Defendants - Appellees,
and
MESSINGLY, Corporalm 3 to 11 shift,
Defendant.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Maryland, at Baltimore. William D. Quarles, Jr., District Judge. (CA-03-595-WDQ)
Submitted: October 14, 2004 Decided: October 21, 2004
Before MOTZ, TRAXLER, and SHEDD, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Malcolm Maxwell Ryidu-X, Appellant Pro Se. Stephanie Judith Lane Weber, OFFICE OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF MARYLAND, Baltimore, Maryland, for Appellees.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).
- 2 - PER CURIAM:
Malcolm Maxwell Ryidu-X appeals the district court’s
order denying relief on his
42 U.S.C. § 1983(2000) complaint. We
have reviewed the record and find no reversible error.
Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district
court. See Ryidu-X v. Maryland Corr. Adjustment Ctr., No. CA-03-
595-WDQ (D. Md. May 19, 2004). We dispense with oral argument
because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in
the materials before the court and argument would not aid the
decisional process.
AFFIRMED
- 3 -
Reference
- Status
- Unpublished