Ryidu-X v. MD Correctional

U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit

Ryidu-X v. MD Correctional

Opinion

UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 04-6989

MALCOLM MAXWELL RYIDU-X, a/k/a Richard Edward Janey,

Plaintiff - Appellant,

versus

MARYLAND CORRECTIONAL ADJUSTMENT CENTER; THOMAS R. CORCORAN, Former Warden; SEWALL SMITH, Warden; AHAMEFULE GRANT EMEZUE, Corporal,

Defendants - Appellees,

and

MESSINGLY, Corporalm 3 to 11 shift,

Defendant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Maryland, at Baltimore. William D. Quarles, Jr., District Judge. (CA-03-595-WDQ)

Submitted: October 14, 2004 Decided: October 21, 2004

Before MOTZ, TRAXLER, and SHEDD, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Malcolm Maxwell Ryidu-X, Appellant Pro Se. Stephanie Judith Lane Weber, OFFICE OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF MARYLAND, Baltimore, Maryland, for Appellees.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).

- 2 - PER CURIAM:

Malcolm Maxwell Ryidu-X appeals the district court’s

order denying relief on his

42 U.S.C. § 1983

(2000) complaint. We

have reviewed the record and find no reversible error.

Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district

court. See Ryidu-X v. Maryland Corr. Adjustment Ctr., No. CA-03-

595-WDQ (D. Md. May 19, 2004). We dispense with oral argument

because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in

the materials before the court and argument would not aid the

decisional process.

AFFIRMED

- 3 -

Reference

Status
Unpublished