Luginbyhl v. American Correctional
Luginbyhl v. American Correctional
Opinion
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 04-6347
LEVI LUGINBYHL,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
versus
AMERICAN CORRECTIONAL ASSOCIATION, Unknown Members, et al.,
Defendant - Appellee.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Maryland, at Baltimore. Alexander Williams, Jr., District Judge. (CA-03-3364-AW)
Submitted: June 14, 2004 Decided: October 21, 2004
Before WILKINSON, LUTTIG, and DUNCAN, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Levi Luginbyhl, Appellant Pro Se.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c). PER CURIAM:
Levi Luginbyhl appeals the denial of his motion for
reconsideration of the district court’s order dismissing his
42 U.S.C. § 1983(2000) complaint for failure to state a claim. We
have reviewed the record and find no reversible error.
Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district
court. See Luginbyhl v. American Correctional Ass’n., No. CA-03-
3364-AW (D. Md. Feb. 13, 2004). Further, we deny Luginbyhl’s
motion for emergency injunction because he did not first present
that motion to the district court, and did not allege that it would
have been impracticable to do so. See Fed. R. App. P.
8(a)(2)(A)(i). We dispense with oral argument because the facts
and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials
before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
- 2 -
Reference
- Status
- Unpublished