Ryidu-X v. Maryland Division of Correction
Opinion
Malcolm Maxwell Ryidu-X appeals the district court’s order denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2000) complaint. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. See Ryidu-X v. Maryland Div. of Corr., No. CA-02-692-WDQ (D. Md. filed May 13, 2004 & entered May 14, 2004). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
Reference
- Full Case Name
- Malcolm Maxwell RYIDU-X, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. MARYLAND DIVISION OF CORRECTION; William W. Sondervan, Commission of Corrections; Thomas R. Corcoran, Warden, Maryland Correctional Adjustment Center, Defendants-Appellees
- Status
- Unpublished