United States v. Wilson
Opinion
Patrice Behanzin Wilson appeals the district court’s margin order denying his motion for reconsideration of the district court’s order denying his motion for an extension of time to file a notice of appeal. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm the order of the court. See United States v. Wilson, No. CR-96-34 (E.D.N.C. Jan 23, 2004). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
Reference
- Full Case Name
- UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff—Appellee, v. Patrice Behanzin WILSON, A/K/A K-Mel, Defendant—Appellant
- Status
- Unpublished