Sanders v. US Dept of the Army

U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit October 19, 2004

Opinion

No. 04-1691

Plaintiff - Appellant,

versus

Defendant - Appellee.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Richmond. Robert E. Payne, District Judge. (CA-03-641-3)

Submitted: October 14, 2004 Decided: October 19, 2004

Before MOTZ, TRAXLER, and SHEDD, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Richard D. Sanders, Appellant Pro Se. Robert P. McIntosh, OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Richmond, Virginia, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c). PER CURIAM:

Richard D. Sanders appeals the district court’s order

dismissing his civil action finding that it is barred by res

judicata. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible

error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the

district court. See Sanders v. United States Dep’t of the Army,

No. CA-03-641-3 (E.D. Va. Apr. 20, 2004). We deny Sanders’ motion

opposing the government’s request for an extension of time to file

its informal brief and dispense with oral argument because the

facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the

materials before the court and argument would not aid the

decisional process.

- 2 -