Theodore Carney, Jr., appeals the district court’s order denying relief on his complaint filed pursuant to Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, as amended, 42 U.S.C. §§ 2000e to 2000e-17 (2000). We have reviewed the parties’ briefs and the joint appendix and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. See Carney v. Universal Hosp. Servs., Inc., No. CA-03-667-3 (E.D.Va. Feb. 26, 2004). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED