United States v. Hampton

U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit

United States v. Hampton

Opinion

UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 04-7002

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff - Appellee,

versus

KENNETH MARION HAMPTON,

Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina, at Columbia. Cameron McGowan Currie, District Judge. (CR-00-616)

Submitted: October 15, 2004 Decided: October 25, 2004

Before MOTZ, TRAXLER, and SHEDD, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Kenneth Marion Hampton, Appellant Pro Se. Stacey Denise Haynes, OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Columbia, South Carolina, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c). PER CURIAM:

Kenneth Marion Hampton appeals the district court’s

orders denying relief on his motion to modify his sentence and his

motion for reconsideration. We have reviewed the record and find

no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated

by the district court. See United States v. Hampton, No. CR-00-616

(D.S.C. filed Apr. 22, 2004 & entered Apr. 24, 2004; May 14, 2004).

We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal

contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the

court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

- 2 -

Reference

Status
Unpublished