Lawton v. Flynt

U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit

Lawton v. Flynt

Opinion

UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 04-7515

DONALD E. LAWTON,

Plaintiff - Appellant,

versus

DEPUTY FLYNT, Grievance; SERGEANT HALL; LIEUTENANT CHAPLIN; MAJOR PINSON; KATHY MCDOUGAL, Grievance; SHERIFF ARTHUR,

Defendants - Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Richmond. Henry E. Hudson, District Judge. (CA-03-734-3)

Submitted: November 4, 2004 Decided: November 10, 2004

Before WILKINSON, MOTZ, and DUNCAN, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Donald Lawton, Appellant Pro Se.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c). PER CURIAM:

Donald E. Lawton appeals the district court’s order

dismissing his

42 U.S.C. § 1983

(2000) complaint without prejudice.

We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error.

Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district

court. See Lawton v. Flynt, No. CA-03-734-3 (E.D. Va. Sept. 1,

2004). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal

contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the

court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

- 2 -

Reference

Status
Unpublished